Legal Opinion

In re Crum

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Glaspell, J. Taylor Crum was disbarred from further practicing as an attorney-at-law, and appeals. The prosecution is defective not being carried on in the name and by the authority of the State of North Dakota as required by the constitution. Section 97, Art. 4, Const.; State v. Hazledahl, 2 N. D. 521; Cox v. State, 8 Tex. App. 254; Lemons v. Peo., 6 Am.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Glaspell, J. Taylor Crum was disbarred from further practicing as an attorney-at-law, and appeals. The prosecution is defective not being carried on in the name and by the authority of the State of North Dakota as required by the constitution. Section 97, Art. 4, Const.; State v. Hazledahl, 2 N. D. 521; Cox v. State, 8 Tex. App. 254; Lemons v. Peo., 6 Am. Rep. 293; Nicholas v. State, 35 Wis. 308; Williams v. State, 27 Wis. 402; Lopez v. State, 19 Mo. 244. It was error to allow supplementary charges to be filed on rehearing had more than five years…

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.

This is a disbarment proceeding brought in the District Court against Taylor Crum, a member of the bar of this court, resident in Cass County. A trial resulted in an order canceling the license of said attorney, and disbarring him from further practicing as an attorney-at-law. From such order the accused appeals to this court.

Section 437 of the Revised Codes reads as follows: “An appeal lies to the Supreme Court from all orders of the District Court revoking or suspending the license of an attorney and counselor at law; and upon an appeal being taken from such order all the original papers,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re EatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Noyes v. AllisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. In re HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  2. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. State v. MosherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Kehoe v. McRaeSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  5. La firma profesional de López de Tord & Zayas Pizarro v. MolinaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API