Legal Opinion

State v. Mosher

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1905PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from TVa/rren District Court'. — Hon. Edmund " Nioi-iols, Judge. Proceedings to revoke the license of L. L, Mosher as an attorney-at-law. ■ Eour of • the nine specifications com tained in the accusation were held to be sustained, and judgment of revocation entered. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Attorneys: disbarment; procedure. The grand jury called the court’s attention to the minutes of certain testimony given before that body concerning a transaction between defendant and one Mrs. Hardin, and the latter’s affidavit relating there- • ° to was also presented. The disclosures were such that the court immediately entered an order designating three members of the local bar to “ draw u,p and file in the name of the state of Jowa the proper accusation against - said L. L. Mosher at least ten days before the first day of the next term of court.” As a part of the same order, he was…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bar Ass'n v. GreenhoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. In Re Detention of CubbageSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. State Bar Commission Ex Rel. Williams v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API