Legal Opinion

In re the Disbarment of Burnette

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1906No. 14,589PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from- Sumner district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge pro tern.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

On September 2, 1903, the district court of Sumner county rendered a judgment revoking the license of Cleo D. Burnette to practice as an attorney and counselor at law. From that judgment an appeal was taken to this court, under the provisions of section 403 of the General Statutes of 1901, which reads as follows:

“In case of a removal or suspension being ordered by a district court, an appeal therefrom lies to the supreme court, and all the original papers, together with a transcript of the docket entries, shall thereupon be transferred to the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  4. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Auditor of State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Coleman v. MacLennanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. In Re Inquiry Relating to RomeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. State Ex Rel. Boynton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API