Kepple v. GPU INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.
Defendant GPU, Inc. moves for summary judgment on all counts of plaintiff Wilson Kepple’s action for employment discrimination based on Ms religion, age and gender. See dkt. no. 10. For the following reasons, I will grant summary judgment for defendant on plaintiffs federal religion claim, in addition to his state law discrimination claim under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). I will deny summary judgment on plaintiffs federal claims of age and gender discrimination.
I.FACTS
A. Introduction
This action arises out of two…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Rogan v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Patel v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Dubose v. District 1199C, National Union of Hospital & Health Care EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- CRONIN v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021