Legal Opinion

Patel v. Shinseki

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Chandrakant R. Patel (“Dr. Patel”), a retired part-time physician at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, brings suit against Defendant Eric K. Shinseki in his official capacity as Secretary for the Department of Veterans Affairs, alleging age discrimination after Dr. Patel was allegedly terminated from his employment in retaliation for voicing complaints of discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). Before the Court is Defendant Secretary Shinseki’s Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howell v. Raymours Furniture Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. BENNETT v. SEPTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Beberman v. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, in his Official CapacityDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2018
  4. Ernst v. Union County Conservation DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. GOODWIN v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API