Legal Opinion
CRONIN v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 30, 2021No. 3:18-cv-12642Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANNE-MARIE CRONIN, Case No. 3:18-cv-12642 (BRM) (ZNQ) Plaintiff, OPINION v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., JESSICA KOZAK, SUZETTE MITCHELL, LESLIE ESPOSITO, JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before this Court is Defendant Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a). (ECF No. 24.) Anne-Marie Cronin (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion (ECF No. 29) and Defendant replied (ECF No. 32).…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.