Legal Opinion

City of Barstow v. Mojave Water Agency

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2000No. S071728PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

I. Introduction

We granted review to determine whether a trial court may definitively resolve water right priorities in an overdrafted basin with a “physical solution” that relies on the equitable apportionment doctrine but does not consider the affected owners’ legal water rights in the basin. We conclude it may not, and affirm the Court of Appeal judgment in that respect. In the second part of this opinion, we address whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the trial court abused its discretion when it determined that a water producer who desired to stipulate to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Lonberg v. City of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  3. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API