MacMillan Buick Co. v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Where a sale has been effected by actionable fraud, the purchaser usually has an election of remedies:
1. The one grounded upon recission or renunciation. Fields v. Brown, 160 N. C., 295, 76 S. E., 8; Van Gilder v. Bullen, 159 N. C., 291, 74 S. E., 1059.
2. The other based upon affirmation. Kennedy v. Trust Co., 213 N. C., 620, 197 S. E., 130; May v. Loomis, 140 N. C., 350, 52 S. E., 725.
In the latter, the purchaser may bring an action to recover for the fraud by which he was induced to make the purchase, or he may recoup any damages which he has sustained if the seller sue him for money due on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Pryor v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Fields v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hutchins v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Davis v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Small v. DorsettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Johnson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Supply Co. v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.