Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, J.
A judgment non obstante veredicto, in effect, is nothing-more than a belated judgment on tbe pleadings. Jernigan v. Neighbors, 195 N. C., 231, 141 S. E., 586; Iron Works v. Beaman, 199 N. C., 537, 155 S. E., 166; Little v. Furniture Co., 200 N. C., 731, 158 S. E., 490; Buick Co. v. Rhodes, 215 N. C., 595, 2 S. E., 699.
“At common law a judgment non obstante veredicto could be granted only when tbe plea confessed tbe cause of action and set up matters in avoidance which, if true, were insufficient to constitute either a defense or a bar to tbe action. It was entered only upon tbe application of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doster v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Shives v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Jernigan v. . NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Howell v. . PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Newby v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- CRAHANE v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- George E. Shepard, Jr., Inc. v. Kim, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Wachovia Bank National Ass'n v. Superior Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.