Legal Opinion

Supply Co. v. . Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action on an alleged combination promissory note, crop lien and chattel mortgage, wherein the ancillary remedy of claim and delivery was invoked by the plaintiff to sell certain personal property of the defendants. The amount alleged to be due the plaintiff by the defendants is $607.39, with interest from 16 April, 1940, the date of the alleged execution of the note, crop lien and chattel mortgage. The $607.39 is alleged to have been due on indebtednesses existing prior to the execution of the note and lien.

Both defendants admit the signing of the note, crop lien and chattel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Sitterson v. . SittersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. City of Durham v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. MacMillan Buick Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. EAST COAST OIL COMPANY v. FairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Lee v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Red Springs City Board of Education v. McMillanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Faulk v. Althouse Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API