Polizzi v. Porcaro
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff sought return of certain moneys paid for an interest in a cannery. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals, on the main ground of insufficiency of evidence. The correctness of the findings is also attacked.
Evidence
Talcing, as we are required to do, the evidence, and the reasonable inferences therefrom, most strongly in favor of defendant, there is substantial evidence to support the verdict. Defendant’s son Vincent owned certain buildings and equipment in Fresno. They were subject to a $10,000 encumbrance. Defendant had a power of attorney from Vincent. Although the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Luckhart v. OgdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Hougland v. Roth Blum Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Fergus v. Venice Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- San Francisco Hotel Co. v. BaiorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Pacific Atlantic Wine, Inc. v. DucciniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. JaquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Vicioso v. WatsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.