Legal Opinion
Hougland v. Roth Blum Packing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1929No. Docket No. 3809PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiffs had judgment in the sum of $3,531.76 for and on account of the alleged failure of the defendant to fulfill its contract for the purchase of certain sheep.
It appears from the record that on or about the third day of February, 1925, the plaintiffs and the defendant entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of sheep, which contract is in the following words and figures: “This is to certify that Valley Sheep Co. of Colusa, have this 3d day of Feb., 1925, bargained and sold to Roth Blum Packing Co. or order, the following described livestock, and do hereby guarantee the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Polizzi v. PorcaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re Black & White Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. HorethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- C. A. Hooper & Co. v. Freeman, Smith & Camp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Black & White Cattle Co. v. Granada Cattle Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.