Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Tenwinkel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1872PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtGrates, J.

This was a suit by defendant in error, upon a promissory note dated October 15, 1870, made by Valentine M. Hyde, and endorsed by Harriet Z. Hyde, payable to Tenwinkel & McCune, and endorsed to defendant in error by the payees. The plaintiffs in error gaye notice with their plea of the general issue, that they should show that the note was given conditionally, to be paid, if at all, out of certain insurance money, if that should be paid without suit or litigation, and that it was not paid without litigation, Harriet Z. Hyde being compelled to sue to recover it. They also gave notice that they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Albion v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Selden v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Fowler v. McQuiggMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Colvin v. GoffOregon Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API