Legal Opinion

Price v. Klett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 99, Calendar No. 35,428PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

For money loaned to one Elton Lahr incident to his purchasing a stock of drugs and store fixtures in December, 1921, plaintiff took a promissory note for $1,800 signed by Lahr and the defendant, Charles Klett. The note matured in one year. It was not paid, but two years after maturity the amount was reduced by a payment of $800 and a new note for $1,000 given to plaintiff. This note was also signed by Klett as well as Lahr and after maturity this note was surrendered and the note in suit given. It reads:

‘ ‘ $1000 no/100 March 21/1927.

“Five months after date I promise to pay to the order of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Barden v. A. Heller Sawdust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sheffler v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cooper v. SonkMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Surety Co. v. FriederichsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. WuerthMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Greenberg v. GlattkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Michigan National Bank v. American Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API