Legal Opinion

Weltzin v. Nail

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 2000No. 98-2114PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the Black Hawk County District Court. The appellant shareholders contend that their demand for a jury trial in their derivative suit was improperly stricken. We granted review and affirm the district court’s ruling.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings

The plaintiffs/appellants in this case are shareholders of LaPorte City Cooperative Elevators. On behalf of the company, they brought a shareholder’s derivative lawsuit against its directors and officers. A derivative lawsuit is unique in that the shareholders allege the company’s directors have…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Larry R. Hedlund v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Rieff v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Bill Grunder's Sons Construction, Inc. v. GanzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Westco Agronomy Co. v. WollesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Weltzin v. COBANK, ACBSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API