Legal Opinion

Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 15, 1948No. 168, Docket 20862PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. The judge properly denied the motion for a directed verdict or a new trial. The evidence was sufficient to justify the jury in concluding (a) that defendant directed plaintiff to work in the manner and at the place in which he .worked, and (b) that defendant was negligent, in requiring plaintiff to perform such services when defendant had not cleared the snow and ice under the car. Since the judge properly charged with respect to a deduction for contributory negligence, pursuant to the Act, we must assume that the jury made such a deduction. On the record before us, we…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API