Legal Opinion

United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1917No. 208PublishedCited by 192 opinions

error to the circuit court of appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

This is an action at law. The complaint alleges that plaintiffs are the holders of more than 200 of the 500,000 shares of the outstanding stock of the defendant United Copper Company, a New Jersey corporation; that the defendants other than that company have by conduct violating the Sherman Law (Act of July 2,1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209) injured it to the extent of more than $5,000,000, 1 and that:

“IV. In or about the month of January, 1912, and before the commencement of this action the plaintiffs, United Copper Securities Company and Arthur P. Heinze, each made a demand upon the defendant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Corbus v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Quincy v. SteelSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  5. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API