Legal Opinion

Bill Grunder's Sons Construction, Inc. v. Ganzer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 1, 2004No. 03-1002PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

This appeal provides an excellent opportunity to reiterate the importance of preservation of error for appeal. The appellant, having filed no resistance with the district court to the appellee’s motion for summary judgment, and having filed no motion after entry of summary judgment, now asks us to reverse the district court’s decision based on grounds first raised in the appellant’s brief to this court. We choose instead to adhere to well-established rules of procedure and notions of fairness and judicial economy. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district court’s grant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. DeVoss v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. State v. McCrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. Sun Valley Iowa Lake Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Estate of Harris v. Papa John's PizzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Otterberg v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Theresa Huck v. Wyeth, Inc. D/B/A Wyeth Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and Pliva, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Jeremie J. Cooksey v. Cargill Meat Solutions CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Robert W. Davis and Kirk K. Peterson v. American International Bridge, Inc., Anfu Wang and Chun Ling LuCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  5. Amended May 19, 2015 In RE the Detention of Calvin Matlock, Calvin MatlockSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API