Mulborn v. Montezuma Improvement Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
These two actions for money had and re-' ceived were commenced by different plaintiffs against the same defendant but they involve substantially the same facts, except as to dates and amounts. They were separately tried and decided, and a judgment was entered in each action against the defendant, from which defendant appeals. The appeals are taken upon separate bills of exceptions printed in a single -transcript and are presented on one set of briefs.
The defendant Montezuma Improvement Co., a corporation, was the owner of approximately 10,700 acres of land situate in Mendocino County, upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Sheplar v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Extension Oil Co. v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.