Legal Opinion

Mulborn v. Montezuma Improvement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1924No. Civ. No. 4437PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

These two actions for money had and re-' ceived were commenced by different plaintiffs against the same defendant but they involve substantially the same facts, except as to dates and amounts. They were separately tried and decided, and a judgment was entered in each action against the defendant, from which defendant appeals. The appeals are taken upon separate bills of exceptions printed in a single -transcript and are presented on one set of briefs.

The defendant Montezuma Improvement Co., a corporation, was the owner of approximately 10,700 acres of land situate in Mendocino County, upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Sheplar v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Extension Oil Co. v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API