United States v. Trippe
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
Defendants Edward Trippe (“Trippe”), Bruce Becker (“Becker”), and Andrew Adams (“Adams”) move for the following relief: (1) suppression of wiretap evidence; (2) disclosure of similar or extrinsic act evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b); (3) accelerated disclosure of Brady and Giglio material; and (4) a summary of the testimony of any expert the Government intends to call at trial. Defendant Patricia Oppito (“Oppito”) moves for (1) dismissal of Count One of the Indictment; and (2) severance of her case. Defendant Bryan McGuire…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. SattarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. SattarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. SantiagoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. GiffenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. ChalmersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.