Legal Opinion

Atherley v. Bullion Monarch Uranium Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1959No. 8859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff-appellant, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, to quiet title to an unpatented mining claim known as the Poison Fraction. Defendant-respondent, hereinafter referred to as defendant, in its answer denied the validity of such claim and sought by counterclaim to quiet its title to an unpatented mining claim known as Farmer John No. 3. The alleged Poison Fraction claim of plaintiff overlaps the southeastern portion of the alleged Farmer John No. 3 claim. This overlapping constitutes the area of dispute in this case.

In the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
  2. Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Shoshone Min. Co. v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  5. Eilers v. BoatmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bunker Chance Mining Co. v. BexIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API