United States v. Bradt
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THURMOND CLARKE, Chief Judge.
This action arises out of a contract under which defendant was to perform custodial services for plaintiff in hospital buildings at March Air Force Base, California.
The Government terminated the agreement because of defendant’s alleged failure to carry out the contract requirements. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held the termination proper, and further determined the Government was entitled to recover reprocurement costs from defendant.
The Government has brought this action for breach of contract, and defendant has counterclaimed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Hills v. EisenhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
- Flynn v. VevelstadDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- First Nat. Bank v. Pioneer Laundry & Cleaners, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1952
- Monk v. United Life & Accident Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. State of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- Baskin v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- United States v. BradtDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
- Gulley v. HurleyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969