Legal Opinion

Pinkerton v. Moore

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1959No. 6507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This is an appeal from the action of the trial court permanently enjoining the defendants from in any manner interfering with the possession of certain unpatented mining claims of the plaintiffs, the defendants seeking a reversal of the judgment on the basis that under the evidence presented the claims had been forfeited in point of law by the plaintiffs and therefore were subject to relocation by the defendants, and upon the further ground that the evidence showed that the claims had been abandoned by the plaintiffs as mining claims.

The trial court had in evidence before it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Farwell v. NeedhamOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Flippo v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Doherty v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. 9,947.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, in County of Clark, State of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1963
  2. Woody Investment, LLC v. Sovereign Eagle, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Silver Jet Mines, Inc. v. SchwarkMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Great Eastern Mines, Inc. v. Metals Corp. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Silver Jet Mines Inc. v. SchwarkMontana Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API