Legal Opinion

Shope v. Sims

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1983No. 6551PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case concerns a dispute over mining claims. Appellants Harold W. Shope and Loren C. Hite (“plaintiffs”) sued Appellees Harold Sims, Bruce Sims and Joel Sims (“Sims”), alleging that the Sims had staked mining claims where their valid claims were already located. The superior court found for the Sims on the ground that the descriptions on the recorded certificates of location for each of the plaintiffs’ claims were insufficient under AS 27.10.050.

On appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the judgment should be reversed on two grounds: (1) the superior court erred in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Bagg v. New Jersey Loan CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Tyee Consolidated Mining Co. v. LangstedtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  5. Harvey v. HavenerMontana Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Miscovich v. TryckAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. Baugh Construction & Engineering Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Fink v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API