Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Brock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 5, 1926No. 14006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANSON, V. C. J.

The plaintiff in error- herein is Mary M. Reynolds. She was the plaintiff in the canse below, and was and is a citizen by blood of the Cherokee Nation, being enrolled as Mary M. Brock, her maiden name. Plaintiff's father was one Hugh Brock, who is named as one of the defendants in this action. In December, 1908, plaintiff was a minor and a good faith resident of Mayes county, living at the home of her said father. In said last named month, Hugh Brock filed a petition in the county court of Mayes county for the appointment of himself as guardian of the said plaintiff and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Lamont v. VingerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Martin v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
  5. McDaniel v. CorrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF BERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Tittle v. RobbersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API