Legal Opinion
Messenger v. Messenger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1992No. 71388Published
1Opinion of the Court
827 P.2d 865 (1992)
James D. MESSENGER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Earla Kay MESSENGER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71388.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
February 18, 1992.
Stephen R. Kistler, Hert, Baker & Kistler, Stillwater, for defendant-appellant.
Christopher D. Szlichta, Szlichta, Ramsey & Meyers, Stillwater, for plaintiff-appellee.
OPALA, Chief Justice.
In Clifton v. Clifton[1] the court held that 12 O.S.Supp. 1987 § 1289(F)[2] should be construed as a bar to post-decree property division readjustment sought to be rested on an after-enacted spousal right to reach military retirement pension income. Clifton…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Doolin; Dissent · Wilson.
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.