Legal Opinion

Messenger v. Messenger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1992No. 71388PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Chief Justice.

In Clifton v. Clifton1 the court held that 12 O.S.Supp.1987 § 1289(F)2 should be construed as a bar to post-decree property division readjustment sought to be rested on an after-enacted spousal right to reach military retirement pension income. Clifton teaches that the provision in subsection (F), which authorizes the reopening of divorce decrees, addresses itself solely to support alimony modification. The narrow issue Clifton left unsettled, which is presented for decision today, is whether decrees rendered before the 1987 amendment enacted by 12 O.S.Supp.1987 §…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API