Legal Opinion

Lamont v. Vinger

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1921No. 4,529PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeals from District Court, Fergus County; Jack Briscoe, Judge. Action by Harry W. Lamont against Ole G. Yinger and another to recover possession of an undivided interest in real estate. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Yinger appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. This is a collateral attack upon the order of sale and the order confirming the sale.

Read the full summary

Appeals from District Court, Fergus County; Jack Briscoe, Judge. Action by Harry W. Lamont against Ole G. Yinger and another to recover possession of an undivided interest in real estate. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Yinger appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. This is a collateral attack upon the order of sale and the order confirming the sale. Where a recital of the character found in the order of .sale and above cited is found in the records, a sale based thereon is not vulnerable to a collateral attack. (11 R. C. L., secs. 474, 476; Richardson v.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In January, 1895, Hannah D. Lamont died intestate in Fergus county, leaving as her heirs at law, W. H. Lamont, her husband, and Charles A. and Harry W. Lamont, her sons, the latter then less than four years old. W. H. Lamont was appointed administrator of the estate, and qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. The inventory returned disclosed that the property left by the deceased consisted of 1,550 sheep, subject to a chattel mortgage, and 238 acres of land (particularly described), of the appraised value of $600. Claims were presented and allowed, which, with the costs and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Seal v. BanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Montgomery v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API