Legal Opinion

Tillman v. Talbert

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1956No. 742PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendants assign as error the denial by the court of their motion for judgment of nonsuit. The defendants contend that the plaintiff, who is not a licensed architect, in furnishing plans for the construction of a house for defendant, was acting as an architect, and that he cannot recover on a quantum meruit, because the work he did was under a contract illegal because it violated Ch. 83 of the General Statutes, and that this is true whether the building was to cost less than $20,000.00 or more.

G.S. 83-12 reads in part: “In order to safeguard life, health and property, it shall be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cain v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. In Re the Receivership of Port Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Rountree v. . BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Shinn v. Edwin Yee, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. CorlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Hawkins v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Holland v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API