State v. Corl
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
After the juay was impaneled to try these cases, defendant ehaillenged “the array on the grounds that eleven of the jurors at present in the panel were present in court on the morning of this díate, at which time the defendant now on trial was being tried on two charges, one of speeding and one of driving after his license was revoked, and that such jurors heard the testimony in these cases and also heard read ,a record of the Department of Motor Vehicles which was admitted in evidence.” To the denial of the challenge, defendant excepted, and assigns this as his assignment of error NumbertOne.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. . BannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. West India Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. McKethanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Jackson v. Housing Authority of City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.