Legal Opinion

Cain v. Bonner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1917No. 2477PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District, in an appeal from Smith County. Cain sued Bonner and wife, was denied a recovery, and appealed. The judgment being reversed and rendered in his- favor for a part only of what he claimed, he obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

As originally brought, this suit was by W. G. Cain for a ■ balance due, with interest, upon a mechanic’s lien contract in the amount of $3000 executed by Charles T. Bonner and wife in favor of one James Bothwell. It was instituted more than four years after the maturity of the contract. Special exceptions urged by the Bonners to the petition on the ground of limitation were sustained. Thereupon, the plaintiff; on February 22, 1911, by an amended petition set up respective written acknowledgments and renewals of the debt executed by the Bonners in his favor, and also its acknowledgment by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duren v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Coles v. KelseyTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Krause v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cousins v. GreyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Harn v. American Mutual Building & Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hanley v. Oil Capital Broadcasting Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Temple Trust Co. v. StobaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Manning v. ChristianTexas Supreme Court · 1935

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API