Nuspl v. Missouri Medical Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, Gary and Cheryl Nuspl, appeal the dismissal of their suit for contract reformation, breach of contract, and negligence. The Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dismissed appellants’ suit against both respondents, Missouri Medical Insurance Company (“Momedico”) and Rollins Burdick & Hunter (“RBH”), on statute of limitations grounds. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
On November 25, 1972, appellants’ son, Keith Nuspl,1 was born. As a result of alleged medical malpractice, Keith sustained serious injuries which, appellants claim, eventually…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Davis v. Laclede Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Stark v. ZehnderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Martin v. Crowley, Wade & Milstead, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Jordan v. WillensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Husch & Eppenberger, LLC v. EisenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wallace v. HelbigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Estate of Cates v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.