Legal Opinion
Husch & Eppenberger, LLC v. Eisenberg
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 2006No. ED 87712PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Presiding Judge.
Elizabeth Eisenberg appeals from the judgment of the Mai court reforming the Agreement and Mutual Release (“Release”) entered into between Eisenberg and the law firm of Husch & Eppenberger on June 15, 1994. Finding no error, we affirm.
In 1992, the law firm of Husch & Eppen-berger, then a partnership, represented Eisenberg regarding the estate of Eisen-berg’s mother. Eisenberg was primarily represented by two attorneys at Husch & Eppenberger, Brad Goss and Barnett McKee. Following the conclusion of Husch & Eppenberger’s representation of Eisenberg, she…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Stark v. ZehnderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Richardson v. QuikTrip Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crow v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Drury v. Missouri Youth Soccer Ass'n, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lunceford v. HoughtlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Will Investments, Inc. v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Calvert v. PlengeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.