Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Shafton
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 26, 1983No. 63923PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RENDLEN, Chief Justice.
This case originated as a suit by Dixon and Aeder, partners in Carlton Green Associates, against Shafton, Turek, Epstein, Lieberman and Bigus, partners in Granada Associates, on a contract claim. The four first named Granada partners cross-claimed against Bigus, who, in addition to being a partner, is a practicing attorney in Kansas City and acted as the attorney for the Granada partners in the transaction with Carlton. The cross-claim charged that Bigus had committed legal malpractice in regard to this contract by advising the other Granada partners to sign it even…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Chemical Workers Basic Union Local No. 1744 v. Arnold Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Hunter v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Rippe v. SutterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- De Paul Hospital School of Nursing, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Koester v. American Republic Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Sheehan v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.