Legal Opinion

Martin v. Crowley, Wade & Milstead, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 17, 1985No. 67173PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

Plaintiffs by their petition for damages charged defendant, a professional engineering, architectural, and land-surveying corporation, with negligence in the survey of a residential lot owned by plaintiffs which they intended as a home construction site. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground the cause of action was barred by § 516.120, RSMo 1978, the applicable statute of limitations. Following reversal in the Western District we granted transfer and now determine the cause as though on original appeal, Mo. Const, art. V, § 10, and we too reverse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Schade v. GehnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Sheehan v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Vogel v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API