Legal Opinion

Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. Graham

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 9, 1999No. 81240PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. 1

Bruce Graham, as representative of the current partners of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (“Skidmore”), appeals the circuit court’s judgment in favor of Business Men’s Assurance Company of America (“BMA”) on the issue of whether BMA’s claim against Skidmore was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. In Business Men’s Assur. Co. v. Graham, 891 S.W.2d 438 (Mo.App.1994) (“BMA I”), the court of appeals reviewed the judgment entered for BMA after a jury trial in this same cause. One of the issues on appeal was whether the statute of limitations issue should have been submitted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Thatcher v. De TarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Baron v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Martin v. Crowley, Wade & Milstead, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Michael Vogt v. State Farm Life Insurance CompCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Trimble v. PracnaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. American Eagle Waste Industries, LLC v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API