Legal Opinion

Cazan v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937No. Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 39,172PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an -appeal from' the department of labor and industry. Plaintiff wak a motor mechanic and had been in the employ of defendant company since 1927 at an average weekly wage of $32. He was employed at the Second avenue garage in Highland Park in the capacity of "tune up” man with duties of tuning the motors and getting the busses ready for the drivers. At 5 a. m., November 2, 1934, plaintiff went to work and was assigned to start coach No. 632 which was a large passenger bus with the motor centrally located between the front and rear wheels. At first plaintiff was unable to start the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Robbins v. Original Gas Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Derleth v. Roach & Seeber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Frankamp v. Fordney HotelMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Beaty v. Foundation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Johnson v. Vibradamp CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Froman v. Banquet Barbecue, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kubiak v. Briggs Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Coombe v. PenegorMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API