Legal Opinion

Frankamp v. Fordney Hotel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The supply of water in Saginaw was thought to be impure. To get water of a better quality the Fordney Hotel put down an artesian well on its own property and piped the water therefrom throughout the hotel except in the pool room. On January 15, 1922, the plaintiff entered the employ of the hotel company as head waitress; she roomed and boarded in the hotel until the 23d of February when she was taken down with typhoid fever, which she •claims was the result of drinking the water from the artesian well. Soon after she was taken sick she was removed to a hospital. It was some time before she…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Travelers' Insurance v. DunlapIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Dove v. Alpena Hide & Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Batesville White Lime Company v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Arquin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ames v. Lake Independence Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. John Rissman & Son v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Neudeck v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API