Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Fox Television Network

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 30, 1997No. 1:96 CV 0281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

NUGENT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants, Fox Television Network and Barbour Langley Productions, Motion for Summary Judgment. (Document # 17). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.

Procedural History

Plaintiff, Willie Reeves, Jr., filed a complaint on February 9, 1996, against defendants Fox Television Network (“Fox”), the network which airs the television show “COPS,” Barbour-Langley Productions (“Barbour”), the producer of the television show “COPS,” and the City of Cleveland (“Cleveland”) 1 . Plaintiff asserts…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roe v. Amazon.comDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  2. Joe Dickerson & Associates, LLC v. DittmarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Doe v. SexSearch. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Seifer v. PHE, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Dittmar v. Joe Dickerson & Associates, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API