Legal Opinion
Roe v. Amazon.com
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 15, 2016No. Case No. 3:15-cv-111PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT JANE DOE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DOC. 45, AND GRANTING ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. DOCS. 23, 24, 32, 37, AND 42.
THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court are a variety of motions by all Defendants. Defendant Jane Doe1 would have the Court grant a *1030Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Doc. 45. Defendants Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble Inc., and Smashwords Inc., who comprise all other remaining defendants, and who will be referred to as the “Corporate Defendants,” all seek summary judgment.2 Docs.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Harvey v. Sys. Effect, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Willowbrook Invs., LLC v. Md. Cas. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Benzaoual v. OhioHealth Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Burke v. Aramark Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Cadence Bank v. HurlDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.