Solomon v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition, MCR 2.116(C)(10). On appeal, plaintiff argues that summary disposition was improper because he presented sufficient evidence to establish a question of fact that precluded summary disposition. Plaintiff also argues that the trial court erred in failing to address his argument that defendant’s experts’ opin*377ions lacked sufficient foundation to be considered as substantive evidence. We affirm.

On March 19, 1997, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant to recover disability insurance benefits…