Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Daniel J. Millstein, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 1, 1997No. 418, Docket 96-7364PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEXLER, District Judge:

BACKGROUND

On September 5, 1990, Millstein, then an attorney practicing in Connecticut, purchased a disability income policy from Massachusetts Mutual. The policy provided benefits if Millstein proved that he had lost earned income due to a disability within the meaning of the policy. Part 1 of the policy defines a “disability” as an incapacity of the Insured, which:

1. is due to injury or sickness; and

2. begins while this policy is in force; and

3. requires care by or at the direction of a legally qualified physician, unless [Massachusetts Mutual] is furnished with proof…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Public Service Mutual Insurance v. GoldfarbNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. Margulies v. HoughDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Colby v. Assurant Employee BenefitsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. FleischerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  5. BLH Ex Rel. GEH v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API