Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1971No. 63PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the court’s denial of his pretrial motions. At the voir dire which Judge Johnston conducted upon these motions the evidence for the State tended to show: Officer Tierney, who arrested defendant at the scene of the collision, did not at any time see him drive his automobile. Defendant was taken to jail, filmed, and given the breathalyzer test before a warrant charging him with drunken driving was served upon him. While the film was being made, and during the breathalyzer test, only police officers and employees of the police department were present. As…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In re NewbernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. State v. MobleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Forte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. State v. HowrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API