Legal Opinion

Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. Graham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 2004No. 25781PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

Baldwin Construction Company (respondent) filed suit against the Grahams (petitioners). Petitioners, after initially responding pro se, retained counsel and moved to be allowed to file an amended answer, set-offs, and counterclaims. In connection with this motion, counsel also moved for a jury trial. The motions were denied. The Court of Appeals affirmed this denial in an unpublished opinion. Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. Graham, Op. No.2002-UP-509 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 30, 2002). Petitioners sought a writ of certio-rari, which we granted. We vacate the Court of Appeals’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Jefferson v. Gene's Used Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Edwards v. SunComSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API