Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. Graham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PLEICONES:
Baldwin Construction Company (respondent) filed suit against the Grahams (petitioners). Petitioners, after initially responding pro se, retained counsel and moved to be allowed to file an amended answer, set-offs, and counterclaims. In connection with this motion, counsel also moved for a jury trial. The motions were denied. The Court of Appeals affirmed this denial in an unpublished opinion. Baldwin Const. Co., Inc. v. Graham, Op. No.2002-UP-509 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 30, 2002). Petitioners sought a writ of certio-rari, which we granted. We vacate the Court of Appeals’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Jefferson v. Gene's Used Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Edwards v. SunComSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.