Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 2006No. 26147PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

369 S.C. 1 (2006)

630 S.E.2d 464

Ex parte CAPITAL U-DRIVE-IT, INC., Respondent.

In re Michelle Wallace, f/k/a Michelle Beaver,

v.

Rhett Alexander Beaver, Appellant.

No. 26147.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard February 15, 2006.

Decided May 8, 2006.

John D. Delgado and Kathrine H. Hudgins, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Todd R. Ellis and Jonathan M. Milling, both of Smith Ellis & Stuckey, P.A., of Columbia, for Ellis, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Justice BURNETT:

In this appeal, we are asked to decide (1) whether an order unsealing a court record is immediately appealable and (2) whether the family…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. City of Rock Hill v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Howard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Thornton v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Corp. (SCE & G)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API