Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 2005No. 2 CA-SA 2005-0011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding J.

¶ 1 In tMs special action, the state contends the respondent judge abused his discretion by finding that statements made by real party in interest Jonathan McMullen in establishing a factual basis for his guilty plea to reckless manslaughter were not admissions of fact for purposes of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). In its amicus brief, the Arizona Attorney General agrees with that contention and also argues that, by pleading guilty to reckless manslaughter, McMullen waived Ms…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Thomas v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API