Legal Opinion
State v. Manning
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 30, 1995No. C7-94-2242PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Otis Manning challenges his conviction for violating the sex offender registration law, Minn.Stat. § 243.166 (Supp.1993). He contends that applying the statute to a felon who was convicted before it took effect violates the ex post facto prohibitions of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1988, Manning was convicted of fourth degree criminal sexual conduct and sentenced to 15 months in prison. Execution of the sentence was stayed, and he was placed on probation for five years. In January 1991, Manning violated the terms of his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Russell v. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.