Iffland v. John
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KING, J., pro tem.
The action seeks a judgment that plaintiff and defendant formed a copartnership as building contractors; that the copartnership be dissolved; that the defendant be required to account for alleged profits, and ■ that the amount found remaining to the credit of the co-partnership be determined and distributed.
The court below found that there was a copartnership, that a profit of $1200 had been realized, which was held .by defendant, that plaintiff had received $350 only of this sum, and gave him judgment for the remaining sum of $250 as his half of the profits.
Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- King v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Fales v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minikin v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Dowd v. GlennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942