Legal Opinion

Hale v. Duke Power Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1979No. 7826SC393PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The question to be determined on a motion for summary judgment is whether there exists any genuine issue as to any material fact. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). Summary judgment for defendant, in a negligence action, is proper where the evidence fails to show negligence on the part of defendant, or where contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff is established, or where it is established that the purported negligence of defendant was not the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury. Bogle v. Duke Power Co., 27 N.C. App. 318, 219 S.E. 2d 308 (1975), cert. denied 289 N.C. 296, 222…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Haynes v. Kaleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Turner v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Small v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Bogle v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Edwards v. AkionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Ziglar v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API