Legal Opinion
Vaske v. DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 12, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-F-274PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed October 5, 1990. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (West Supp. 1990). For the reasons below, defendants’ motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
I
Beginning in 1980, Plaintiff Alphonse Vaske (“Vaske”) was employed as a salesman in the contact lens industry. In September, 1988, Vaske began to look for alternative employment. Vaske ultimately secured an interview with Defendant…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stahl v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Mares v. Conagra Poultry Co., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Fry v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Russell v. GTE Government Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Bell v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.